Stuart du Casse — CEO

𝗥𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝗻 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗼 𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁. If your tests are green but shipping still feels tense, you do not have a test automation problem. You have a release signal problem. I work with CTOs and engineering leaders in scaling SaaS and regulated platforms where CI/CD pipelines and test automation already exist, but leadership still cannot defensibly answer one question: “𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗳𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽?” • The issue is not coverage. • Tests prove execution, not protection. • Intent is unclear. Ownership is implicit. Failures don’t translate into business risk. My work converts existing test automation and CI/CD signals into decision-grade release signal, so go/no-go decisions are defensible. 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗿𝘆 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁: 𝗥𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 (𝟮–𝟱 𝗱𝗮𝘆𝘀) A short, fixed-scope diagnostic on one critical business journey, end-to-end. You get a written decision brief that answers: “𝗗𝗼 𝘄𝗲 𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗷𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆?” 𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝗱𝗲𝘀: • Risk exposure across the journey (where you’re blind, and what it could cost) • Gaps between assumed behaviour and actual system behaviour • Whether current automation is meaningful or misleading • Clear recommendations to restore a trusted release signal This is contained calibration, not open-ended discovery. 𝗕𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗶𝘁: • Scaling SaaS / regulated platforms, roughly 15–150 engineers • CI and automation already in place (Playwright, Cypress, Selenium, mixed) • Release confidence currently sits in individuals, not the system • Decisions require justification (audit, investors, regulation, incident recovery)

Stackforce AI infers this person is a SaaS and Fintech expert specializing in release confidence and risk management.

Location: Bournemouth, England, United Kingdom

Experience: 3 yrs 3 mos